Skip to main content

The Los Angeles... Celtics?

Rumors continue to swirl regarding a trade for Boston Celtics coach Doc Rivers and player Kevin Garnett to the Los Angeles Clippers for at least two players. My initially problem is not with the trade itself. Trades happen all the time in the NBA and other sports. My problem lies with Doc Rivers himself and he is most likely part of the reason this trade is being orchestrated.

Doc Rivers has three years remaining on his contract and has thus far been mum this off season on his coaching plans for the future. He has still been participating in the teams off season practices and trade evaluations. And yet this man has still not officially stated he is coming back or resigning. Now, it would seem that at this point he would move forward with coaching the team, seeing how it has been over a month since the Celtics packed their bags for vacation.

Suddenly, the Clippers head coaching position opens up and it seems that Doc Rivers is interested in heading there. Now, he has not come out and said anything to that effect, but it is widely known that Doc Rivers does not want to be part of a rebuilding project in Boston. So, he sees this opportunity to go to the Clippers and for all we know, he is secretly pushing Danny Ainge (Boston's General Manager) to make this trade. All because the Clippers would have a better team and a better shot at winning a title within the next few years.

Herein lies my problem. To begin with, I have no problem with coaches, players, etc. to chase that elusive title. That's the penultimate achievement for any pro athlete or coach. The problem is how they go about it. Take this situation, for example. Doc Rivers signed a new contract just last year. He had to know that a rebuilding phase was coming soon, especially with the likes of Paul Pierce, Kevin Garnett, and Ray Allen (who later went to the Heat, but that's a different story for another time) approaching their twilight years. Why sign the contract if you don't want to go through that? Yes, the Celtics could have done more, but at that point, money was tied up and a rebuilding phase was inevitable. Doc Rivers could have easily taken the year off and waited for his ideal coaching position. In that regard, that is leaving a team fairly, though I still have trouble backing it up.

Shouldn't a true player or coach want to try to lead a team with lesser or younger talent to glory? Phil Jackson might be a great coach for all I know, but when your teams have always contained the best players in the world, how can we really tell? Want to impress me, come out of retirement to coach the Bobcats. Turn them into winners and I'll say, "Way to go Phil Jackson. You are truly a good coach." That's why I've always respected part of Larry Brown. That's right, part of him. He has always had the ability to lead teams, sometimes teams with lesser talent, to the promised lands of winning records and playoff appearances. The part of Larry Brown I don't completely respect is the part that always moved from place to place. If he could have lasted a year or two longer at some jobs, he might have won more championships. The man always accepted a challenge and that I can respect.

So, Doc Rivers, if you want to impress me, you should stay with Boston. Maybe I'm wrong and you do want to stay there, but you should at least come out and say that, then. Don't remain silent and leading millions of Celtics fans on. Say you'll come back and lead Boston for the remainder of your contract. Help to usher in a new era of Celtic Pride and prove that you can still leader a winner despite lack of talent. You've done it before, right here in Boston. Then, after three years, you can take your talent to Cleveland, where you can lead Lebron James and Kevin Durant to the titles they've always wanted. Until then, show Boston your love. I'm quite sure they'll show you theirs.



Popular posts from this blog

The Bromance of Freddie Prinze, Jr. and Matthew Lillard

In the late 1990's and early 2000's, there was no greater bromance than that between Freddie Prinze, Jr. and Matthew Lillard. The two of them appeared in no less than five movies together in a five year time span. These two were meant to be. Two young stars destined to take the world by storm as a team. Hanging out, meeting women, and enjoying the good life. And then, just like that, stardom was ripped away from them. Though they continued to work, they would never appear together again in a film.
What was it that pulled them apart? Did they just choose to go different directions? Was it Sarah Michelle Gellar that drove a wedge between these two? While Lillard eventually went on to star in an Oscar nominated film (The Descendants), Prinze, Jr. went on to write for the WWE and occasionally show up as a guest star on television shows. While both have tried, neither has recaptured that joy that once displayed on screen. Tonight, I want to dutifully remind the world of t…

From Negan with Love

YouTube screenshot
*The following contains Spoilers from the season 7 premiere of "The Walking Dead"
"Pissing our pants yet? Boy, do I have a feeling we're getting close."- Negan, The Walking Dead

And people thought Ramsay Bolton was sadistic.

The much anticipated season seven premiere of The Walking Dead hit the airwaves last Sunday. Boy, was it a doozy.
I am not going to spend much time on what side of the liked/didn't like it/I'm never watching again spectrum I fall in. I will say that I was enraptured, on the edge of my seat for nearly the entire one hour, six minutes (including commercials) of the episode. This was an episode that filled me with a sense of existential dread for the characters inhabiting The Walking Dead world. It is a feeling that is still with me nearly two days later.
As a disclaimer, I am only through the first ten volumes of the graphic novels. I have yet to reach the Negan arc. I am also on the side of the court that didn't m…

American Sports Franchises Thirsty for a Title

image courtesy of
A billy goat. A dash of bad luck. A sprinkle of a die hard fan. Leon Durham. Add those together and you have the beginnings of the recipe for the curse that has haunted the Chicago Cubs for over 70 years.
In winning the 2016 World Series, the Cubs collected their first World Series title since 1908. Their seven-game victory effectively ended the longest title drought among the four major professional sports leagues in the United States.

Now that the talk of a goat and Bartman can be put to rest, it is now the Cleveland Indians sitting on the longest drought in the Major League baseball. The Indians will be discussed here, as will the other longest droughts in the three other major American sports leagues.
MLB-Cleveland Indians
The Indians moved through the American League this postseason with ease. First, they swept the Boston Red Sox in the ALDS. Then, they took care of the Toronto Blue Jays in five games.
Yes, the Indians lost in the World Series after l…