Skip to main content

The NFL and Los Angeles: A (mis)match Made in Heaven

 photo courtesy of wikipedia

Any day now, fans of the San Diego Chargers, St. Louis Rams and Oakland Raiders will learn which of their teams will be making the move to Los Angeles for the 2016 season and beyond. Chances are two of them will be making the move, setting the stage for the return of pro football to the city of Angels.

This has been a culmination of a two-decade long process in which the NFL and, in recent years Roger Goodell, have been (not so gently) nudging owners to bring a team back to Los Angeles. 

It appears the NFL will get their wish by approving not one but two teams for a return to Los Angeles. A move that no doubt will be celebrated. Owners and Goodell should proceed with caution, though. After all, are football fans and the city of Los Angeles truly clamoring to bring back franchises that left the city high and dry once before?

The NFL has had its opportunity in Los Angeles in the past. The result? All three of these teams ended up leaving for greener pastures (Or in the case of the Chargers, the AFL-NFL merger in 1961 and the subsequent move from Los Angeles to San Diego).

The Raiders organization once was housed in Los Angeles under the ownership of Al Davis. Davis loved to toy with the hearts of Oakland and Los Angeles, seemingly moving this franchise between the two cities as often as the late George Steinbrenner hired and fired manager Billy Martin.

The Rams, meanwhile, left Los Angeles because they were tired of sharing a city with another franchise. And the lure of a new stadium also helped.

Now to be fair, it's not like the NFL is forcing these three teams to move. The owners went through the proper channels of filing relocation papers and the owners still have to vote on the entire situation. By November, though, the intent of the owners was pretty clear, as if they said, "Oh well.  We tried to make it happen in our current city. Plus, Los Angeles seems like a cool place."

Goodell, during his tenure as NFL commissioner, has always seemed to make it a high priority to expand the game and return a team to Los Angeles.  The idea being it is not right that one of the largest populated cities in America didn't have a team.  Pro football is America's sport and it deserves to have a team in Los Angeles. Oh, and the money generated from the television market alone will make all the owners and the NFL even richer.

Multiple failed attempts at building a new stadium in Los Angeles have failed over the years.  Bids have come up short and locations have not panned out.  Instead of stepping back and saying, "We're doing just fine as a league.  Maybe we should let a move to L.A. happen organically," the NFL has continued to press the issue, eventually letting the owners submit proposals to move their franchise to L.A., stadium plans and all. Who cares if two of these teams abandoned this city in the 90's?

Fans of the Chargers, meanwhile, are stuck because the owner and the city of San Diego refuse to find common ground in building a new stadium. Though the franchise is valued at over a billion dollars, owner Dean Spanos repeatedly asked for the city to fund the majority of building a new stadium. Fed up with the lack of progress over the years, Spanos finally submitted joint proposal with the Raiders to share a new stadium in Los Angeles (Or Carson, CA to be exact, on the grounds of a now closed landfill).

Speaking of stadiums, a new one will not even be finished until the start of the 2019 season. That's three seasons in which one (or two) of these teams won't even have a true home stadium. The Rose Bowl said 'no' to a temporary team and the Coliseum appears to have agreed to hosting one team. And it's not like the teams that get approved for relocation can continue to play in their current home cities. I know if I lived in San Diego, knowing my team was there only temporarily, I would not support the owner who moved away my team.

The NFL insists the fans of football want a team in Los Angeles. If anything, reaction has been mixed at best. I can say that when I lived in Los Angeles, I didn't exactly hear people yearning for a team in Los Angeles. The sample size was small, comparatively, to the population of L.A., but the people I knew were fans of other teams, even those old enough to be around when the Rams and Raiders were in Los Angeles. Old school Los Angeles Raiders fans may want the team to return, but the sad irony is that the Raiders, the one team fans want back, will probably get to stay in Oakland while the Chargers and the Rams make the move.

The owners in the NFL see dollar signs in their eyes and will most likely vote on sending two teams to Los Angeles. Judging by the reaction of the internet, Rams fans are saying good riddance and Chargers fans are saying too bad. There will be a few stragglers, especially for Chargers fans that will remain faithful to the careers of Philip Rivers and Antonio Gates, but for the most part it does not seem fans will follow their franchises to Los Angeles.

Fans will go to games in Los Angeles. For awhile, anyhow. The games will be a place to be seen, to mingle, and to root for a team they absolutely have no allegiance to. Fans will go simply because it is the hip thing to do.

Once the novelty wears off, though, the NFL will realize its mistake in moving two teams to Los Angeles. One team, or both, will inevitably struggle. With the idea of football in Los Angeles no longer enticing, fans, with no true allegiance, will stay away from the stadium. The NFL will soon ponder why they moved two teams to Los Angeles, when one wasn't even necessary to begin with. Then we can all think back to a simpler time. A time when there was no team in Los Angeles and all fans had to wonder was this: When are the London Jaguars going to make their debut?

That's where the NFL is headed. And Los Angeles is where the downfall began. Like Sunday afternoons football games in the fall in San Diego, the long-term success of pro football in L.A. will eventually become one thing: a long forgotten dream.


Popular posts from this blog

The Bromance of Freddie Prinze, Jr. and Matthew Lillard

In the late 1990's and early 2000's, there was no greater bromance than that between Freddie Prinze, Jr. and Matthew Lillard. The two of them appeared in no less than five movies together in a five year time span. These two were meant to be. Two young stars destined to take the world by storm as a team. Hanging out, meeting women, and enjoying the good life. And then, just like that, stardom was ripped away from them. Though they continued to work, they would never appear together again in a film.
What was it that pulled them apart? Did they just choose to go different directions? Was it Sarah Michelle Gellar that drove a wedge between these two? While Lillard eventually went on to star in an Oscar nominated film (The Descendants), Prinze, Jr. went on to write for the WWE and occasionally show up as a guest star on television shows. While both have tried, neither has recaptured that joy that once displayed on screen. Tonight, I want to dutifully remind the world of t…

From Negan with Love

YouTube screenshot
*The following contains Spoilers from the season 7 premiere of "The Walking Dead"
"Pissing our pants yet? Boy, do I have a feeling we're getting close."- Negan, The Walking Dead

And people thought Ramsay Bolton was sadistic.

The much anticipated season seven premiere of The Walking Dead hit the airwaves last Sunday. Boy, was it a doozy.
I am not going to spend much time on what side of the liked/didn't like it/I'm never watching again spectrum I fall in. I will say that I was enraptured, on the edge of my seat for nearly the entire one hour, six minutes (including commercials) of the episode. This was an episode that filled me with a sense of existential dread for the characters inhabiting The Walking Dead world. It is a feeling that is still with me nearly two days later.
As a disclaimer, I am only through the first ten volumes of the graphic novels. I have yet to reach the Negan arc. I am also on the side of the court that didn't m…

American Sports Franchises Thirsty for a Title

image courtesy of
A billy goat. A dash of bad luck. A sprinkle of a die hard fan. Leon Durham. Add those together and you have the beginnings of the recipe for the curse that has haunted the Chicago Cubs for over 70 years.
In winning the 2016 World Series, the Cubs collected their first World Series title since 1908. Their seven-game victory effectively ended the longest title drought among the four major professional sports leagues in the United States.

Now that the talk of a goat and Bartman can be put to rest, it is now the Cleveland Indians sitting on the longest drought in the Major League baseball. The Indians will be discussed here, as will the other longest droughts in the three other major American sports leagues.
MLB-Cleveland Indians
The Indians moved through the American League this postseason with ease. First, they swept the Boston Red Sox in the ALDS. Then, they took care of the Toronto Blue Jays in five games.
Yes, the Indians lost in the World Series after l…